Installation Restoration Program
Fact Sheet # 2000-07
October 2000

Ecological Impact Monitoring

A fact sheet providing information about special monitoring activities in the groundwater cleanup program at MMR
                                  

This fact sheet provides information on ecological impact monitoring which addresses potential ecological concerns associated with the cleanup of groundwater plumes emanating from the Massachusetts Military Reservation (MMR).

The Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence (AFCEE) initiated the Ecological Studies Program in 1996 to coincide with the installation of several groundwater treatment systems.  Currently, there are 12 groundwater treatment systems operating at MMR.  In 2000, AFCEE integrated the Ecological Studies Program with performance monitoring (a sampling program that ensures each treatment system is operating as designed) into a combined program called System Performance and Ecological Impact Monitoring Program (SPEIM).

The purpose of the Ecological Impact Monitoring (EIM) portion of the SPEIM is to monitor and evaluate potential effects of groundwater plumes and the groundwater cleanup activities (i.e. treatment systems) on the various ecosystems on or surrounding MMR.  To accomplish this, the following objectives need to be achieved:

  •  Identify potential impacts to groundwater/surface water and track migration of plumes to adjacent surface water bodies

  • Determine whether there is a risk to ecosystems from chemicals associated with groundwater plumes emanating from MMR

  • Assess potential impacts on ecosystems during  construction and operation of treatment systems

Words in italics are defined in the glossary at the end of this fact sheet.

General Conclusions

Ecosystems that depend primarily on groundwater for their continued health could be affected by groundwater contamination and related cleanup activities. Based on data through 1999, the currently operating groundwater treatment systems are not adversely affecting local ecosystems and there is no indication of consistent or measurable MMR-related contaminants in surface water bodies, with the following exceptions: [1] Trichloroethylene (TCE) has been shown to be upwelling into Johns Pond and [2] Ethylene dibromide (EDB) has been shown to be upwelling in the Quashnet River.  EDB also has been detected in bog ditches adjacent to the Coonamessett River.

Background

Generally speaking, the EIM compares the quality of groundwater before and after it is discharged from the treatment systems and looks for changes that could potentially affect local ecosystems.  The major components of that comparison include the following:

  • Conducting baseline sampling of local eco-systems to chart initial conditions before a treatment system begins operating.

  • Measuring the quality of groundwater before and after treatment for such things as pH, dissolved oxygen, and total organic carbon.  This ensures that the treatment systems are not altering the existing physical and chemical properties of the groundwater.

  • Measuring the water table to confirm that the treatment system is not altering the natural hydraulic flow of the groundwater.

  • Assessing potential impacts to rare and critical habitats in areas such as agriculture, recreational areas, wetlands, fisheries, and wildlife.

Overview of Ecological Program

Ecological monitoring currently is being performed on ecosystems associated with seven groundwater plumes which have treatment systems in place originating from MMR (see map below). They are: Ashumet Valley, Chemical Spill-10 (CS-10), Fuel Spill-1 (FS-1), Fuel Spill-12 (FS-12), Fuel Spill-28 (FS-28), Landfill-1 (LF-1) and Storm Drain-5 (SD-5).  

MMR plumes and treatment systems map

Please see an example below of how a groundwater plume, (in this case, the FS-12 groundwater plume) is monitored in the Ecological Studies program.

Monitoring of ecosystems is done in two phases.  Phase I establishes baseline characterization of ecosystems that may be affected by groundwater contamination or cleanup activities.  Phase I also looks at “reference” ecosystems, which are not potentially affected by groundwater contamination or its cleanup activities, and serve as a comparison before a treatment system becomes fully operational.  Conditions within the natural state of groundwater such as fluctuations in the water table, temperature, and pH also are evaluated.     

Once treatment systems have been constructed and started up, Phase II is implemented to assess potential adverse impacts to ecosystems from the operation of the groundwater treatment systems.

The following ecosystems are studied:

  • ponds

  • vernal pools

  • wetlands

  • rivers

  • saltwater harbors

Groundwater, surface water and sediments are analyzed for:

  • chemicals [such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and ethylene dibromide (EDB)]

  • physicochemical compounds (such as dissolved organic carbon and micronutrients)

  • field parameters (e.g., nitrates, pH, temperature)

  • chlorophyll a 

Biological resources surveyed include vegetation, amphibians and threatened/endangered species.

Baseline Characterization (Phase I)

Baseline monitoring is used to characterize ecosystems prior to groundwater treatment system operation. Phase I data are collected for up to a year prior to operation of a groundwater treatment system. Measurements are done up to four to six times per year, if possible.

Ecosystems most likely to be potentially affected by operation of the treatment systems were selected for monitoring.  Similar types of ecosystems also were selected to be used as reference ecosystems. Baseline conditions in reference ecosystems are compared to conditions of potentially affected ecosystems. The differences between the two ecosystems are evaluated further. This comparison is used to determine possible effects on an ecosystem from the operation of the treatment system.

Operational Monitoring (Phase II)

Operational monitoring is used to determine if groundwater treatment systems may be affecting ecosystems. A two-tiered process is used to assess ecological parameters. 

Tier I parameters are directly measurable effects associated with the operation of the treatment system. Currently, Tier I parameters are:

  • pH

  • temperature

  • dissolved oxygen

  • total organic carbon in surface water only

  • dissolved organic carbon in groundwater only

  • water levels

Tier II parameters are those which are affected indirectly by the operation of a groundwater treatment system (e.g. natural state of a water body, aquatic biological resources).

To measure potential effects of a treatment system on ecosystems, Tier I and Tier II parameters are measured against a reference ecosystem and compared to baseline conditions. If no reference ecosystem is identified, Phase II results are compared to Phase I results to determine if a treatment system may be affecting an ecosystem.

Ecological criteria guidelines have been developed for the Tier I and Tier II parameters for use in identifying changes that, if exceeded, may require a corrective or preventive response.  These guidelines were developed jointly with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), and the Technical Review and Evaluation Team (TRET). These ecological criteria guidelines are used both in designing groundwater treatment systems (in order to prevent or minimize adverse impacts to nearby ecosystems), and in evaluating whether or not the system is adversely affecting the local ecosystem.

Example of General Ecological Studies Outline (ex. Fuel Spill-12 (FS-12))

Potentially Impacted Areas: Snake Pond is the only ecosystem that was monitored for the FS-12 area.  However, neighboring Weeks Pond initially was monitored as a potentially impacted area, but was eliminated  because groundwater recharge to Weeks Pond initially flowed through Snake Pond.  Therefore, impacts associated with plume contaminants and the treatment system would initially be observed in Snake Pond.

Reference Areas: Triangle and Peters Ponds

Contaminants of concern: ethylene dibromide (EDB) and benzene

Phase I activities: The following activities were conducted during Phase I:

  • Clusters of seepage meters and piezometers were installed in Snake and Weeks ponds to determine: [1] the permeability of the near-shore pond bottom sediments; [2] the locations in the pond that receive the greatest amount of groundwater seepage; [3] the rates of groundwater seepage; [4] the vertical gradients between groundwater and the ponds; and [5] the physical and chemical properties of groundwater entering the pond.

  • Four micro-wells were installed in Snake Pond to define the near-shore groundwater flow.  These wells also can be used for monitoring water quality during the Phase II portion of the investigation.

  • Two monitoring wells were installed near Triangle Pond, and two more were installed near Peters Pond to characterize the groundwater-surface water interaction near these ponds.

  • Groundwater was sampled from monitoring wells.

  • Surface water and sediment samples were collected at Snake Pond, as well as two reference ponds (Triangle and Peters).

  • Biological resources (e.g. vegetation, amphibians, phytoplankton, zooplankton, benthic macroinvertebrates) were sampled as an initial baseline.  By agreement with the regulatory agencies and AFCEE, chlorophyll a would be sampled in lieu of subsequent biological resource sampling.  NOTE: If plume contaminants, or any unusual ecological activity is observed in Snake Pond, more sampling of biological resources will be conducted. 

Phase II activities: The following activities were conducted during Phase II:

  • Groundwater was sampled from reference area wells to compare to data collected at downgradient wells.

  • Reinjection well water was sampled to assess the impact of the treatment water on overall water quality.

  • Groundwater downgradient of the treatment plant was sampled to evaluate possible effects from reinjection of treated groundwater.

  • Groundwater was sampled near and under Snake Pond to identify possible changes in contaminant migration.

  • Surface water, sediment, and biological resources in Snake Pond and its reference ecosystems were sampled.   Surface water sampling is still being done, however, sediment sampling is no longer being performed.  NOTE:  If plume contaminants, or any unusual ecological activity is observed in Snake Pond, more sampling of sediment will be conducted. 

Results to date: Most of the Tier I and II parameters were within acceptable ecological guidelines.  Those not within guidelines were attributed to natural variation.

  •  The FS-12 treatment system has had minimal to no adverse effect on the ecosystems in proximity to its operation as measured by analysis of both Tier I and Tier II parameters.

  • None of the contaminants from the FS-12 plume have been detected in the surface water of Snake Pond.

Key cleanup system features: The FS-12 treatment system con­sists of 25 extraction wells, a treatment plant, and 23 reinjection wells.  The system treats 800 gallons per minute (over one million gallons per day).

Reports

Currently, reports are prepared quarterly during Phase I and semiannually during Phase II.  Reports that include the assessment or evaluation of data are produced annually.  Because startup time for each treatment system varies, reports are issued on slightly different schedules.

For More Information:

Information pertaining to plume cleanup can be found in several plume-specific fact sheets and other AFCEE publications available at local libraries or on this website.

Doug Karson, Community Involvement Specialist
HQ AFCEE/MMR
322 East Inner Road
Otis ANGB, MA 02542-5028
Phone: (508) 968-4678 X2 Fax (508) 968-4673
E-mail: doug.karson@mmr.brooks.af.mil 

Jim Murphy, Community Involvement Coordinator
USEPA New England, Suite 1100
One Congress Street (RAA)
Boston, MA 02203
Phone: (617) 918-1028 Fax: (617) 918-1029
E-mail: murphy.jim@epa.gov 

Ellie Grillo, Community Involvement Coordinator
MassDEP
20 Riverside Drive
Lakeville, MA 02346
Phone: (508) 946-2866 Fax: (508) 947-6557
E-mail: ellie.grillo@state.ma.us

Glossary

dissolved organic carbon The fraction of total organic carbon in water that passes through a 0.45 micron pore-diameter filter.

ecosystem—A system formed by the interaction of a community of organisms with their environment.

ethylene dibromide (EDB)—An additive formerly used in aviation gas to control the build-up of lead in engines.

field parameters—Measurements made in the field for pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen, specific conductivity, oxidation-reduction potential, and turbidity.

groundwater plume—That portion of groundwater con­taining contaminants that exceed federal and state drink­ing water levels or other risk-based levels.  Contaminated water can result when fuels, solvents, or other contaminants are spilled or released to the ground.  When these materi­als filter and move downward through the sandy Cape Cod soil, they enter the water table, contaminating the groundwater.  As the groundwater moves, the con­taminants are carried along with it, creating a groundwater plume.

pH— A measure of the degree of the acidity or the alkalinity of a solution as measured on a scale ("pH scale") of 0 to 14. 7 is neutral, while 0 is more acidic, and 14 is more basic.

piezometer—A small, hand-driven monitoring well that is used to sample groundwater that is near the ground surface.

seepage meter—A small device used to determine inflow and outflow rates of groundwater to a pond.

staff gauge—A measuring device that is placed in a pond or river to record water level fluctuations.

System Performance and Ecological Impact Monitoring (SPEIM) Program—The merged program of the Ecological Studies Program and the  Performance Monitoring Program.  The SPEIM program helps to determine if the extraction wells are capturing the plume as designed, if the treatment plant is operating efficiently, and whether there are any impacts to the surrounding ecosystems.

Technical Review and Evaluation Team (TRET)—A group of hydrogeological and eco­logical experts from MADEP, EPA, HAZWRAP/Oak Ridge National Laboratories, Waste Policy Institute (WPI), AFCEE, the Cape Cod Commission, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the University of Utah, Kansas State University, the Barnstable County Science Advisory Panel, the Woods Hole Oceanic Institution, and other local scientists. The TRET is tasked with advising the remedial project man­agers, AFCEE, and its contractors on technical and scientific issues of concern.

Trichloroethylene (TCE)—A solvent used to dissolve or disperse another substance such as oil, and is often used in de­greasing metal.

volatile organic compounds (VOCs)—Any organic compound that evaporates readily to the atmosphere.

footer graphic