Attachment 10
Master Integrated Program Schedule

AFCEE/MMR has developed a comprehensive Master Integrated Program Schedule (MIPS) that captures and integrates all major activities and milestones related to the entire MMR Installation Restoration Program (IRP). The comprehensive MIPS contains the following:

  • A timeline covering the previous fiscal year, the current fiscal year and a four year look-ahead. This timeline will progress forward in time as continued updates are issued to the Strategic Plan.
  • The enforceable milestones related to the Comprehensive Plume Response Plan and Schedule required by Amendment No.2, 25 April 1997, to the Federal Facility Agreement.
  • The delivery dates for the Primary and Secondary Documents as associated with all MMR sites and the associated tasks required for meeting those dates.

Legend for reviewing the MIPS:

Notes:

  1. The NGB will be performing a non-time critical action in conjunction with the numerous drainage structures on MMR. Decision Document will be submitted within six months of completed removal program.
  2. The NGB will be performing a non-time critical removal action. The draft EE/CA for this removal will be submitted in November 1997 with the draft Action Memorandum scheduled for April 1998. Decision Document will be submitted within six months of completed removal.
  3. After the submittal of draft Supplemental Site Investigation report AFCEE will submit either a Decision Document within six months or a Remedial Investigation work plan within eight months. The actual path (Decision Document or Remedial Investigation) for each individual study area is tentative and will be finalized based on EPA review of the Supplemental Site Investigation work.
  4. The Site Investigation is complete. A draft Decision Document will be submitted within six months following EPA decision on site status. Could be moved to ARNG Impact Area Study.
  5. A Plume Management Process Action Team (PAT) which consists of the NGB, EPA, Massachusetts DEP, Remedial Program Managers, as well as community representatives has developed a Plume Response Plan (PRP) which recommends an interim capture plan for the groundwater plumes at these sites. This PRP has been approved at the DoD level. The Feasibility Studies for the final actions at these sites will be extended pursuant to Section XIV of the FFA, and the NGB and EPA will determine enforceable deadlines for these primary documents.
  6. Draft Decision Document was submitted. MassDEP has requested additional investigation. Decision to be made.
  7. Additional Remedial Investigation field work is being conducted to address EDB concerns. The investigation will be conducted June/July 1997. Revised Remedial Investigation draft report will be submitted in November 1997. Schedule for draft No-Further-Action Proposed Plan is February 1998 and draft Record of Decision in September 1998. Issue of FS-2 will be decided based on FS-1 results. Correlation report will require revision. The schedule for FS-2 will be determined based on the results of the final correlation report.
  8. This source area will undergo a removal action and treatment in Spring/Summer FY94 along with the source areas at FTA-1 and FS-25. After the removal action is complete a Removal Action Completion Report will be submitted within six months of the removal.
  9. The LF-1 Groundwater Operable Unit Remedial Investigation and the results from additional down gradient field work will be evaluated to determine the disposition of the LF-1 Source Northwest Operable Unit. After evaluation, AFCEE will either submit a No-Further-Action Proposed Plan within six months, or a Feasibility Study within eight months.
  10. Based on the results of the Site Investigation, NGB will either submit a draft Remedial Investigation work plan in September 1995, or will initiate a Supplemental Site Investigation with PRE within three months.
  11. Preliminary final Decision Document to be submitted May 1997. Draft Decision Document was originally submitted in September 1993.
  12. Additional time requested by letter to EPA dated 20 May 97 due to lack of comments for EPA on Feasibility Study.

This is referred to as the six Areas-of-Concern grouping of 13 sites. Comments from the regulatory agencies on draft Proposed Plan are late, an extension request for delay in the submittal of the draft Record of Decision will be prepared once comments are received.

Schedule

Page 1 of Schedule Page 2 of Schedule Page 3 of Schedule Page 4 of Schedule
Page 5 of Schedule Page 6 of Schedule Page 7 of Schedule Page 8 of Schedule
Page 9 of Schedule Page 10 of Schedule Page 11 of Schedule Page 12 of Schedule
Page 13 of Schedule Page 14 of Schedule Page 15 of Schedule Page 16 of Schedule
Page 17 of Schedule Page 18 of Schedule Page 19 of Schedule Page 20 of Schedule
Page 21 of Schedule Page 22 of Schedule Page 23 of Schedule Page 24 of Schedule
Page 25 of Schedule Page 26 of Schedule Page 27 of Schedule Page 28 of Schedule
Page 29 of Schedule Page 30 of Schedule Page 31 of Schedule Page 32 of Schedule
Page 33 of Schedule Page 34 of Schedule Page 35 of Schedule Page 36 of Schedule
Page 37 of Schedule Page 38 of Schedule Page 39 of Schedule Page 40 of Schedule
Page 41 of Schedule

table of contents
previous
next